You will find dozens of pages promising you the exact MTS cut off. Before a result is declared, nobody can know it, and once it is declared the only number worth trusting is the one printed in the Commission's own result notice. So this page does something more useful than guessing. It explains how the MTS cut off is actually constructed - normalised Session-II marks rather than your raw score, separate lists for each category and each State or Union Territory, and a different arrangement altogether for Havaldar posts - so that you can read the official file correctly, understand why your friend in another state cleared with a different score, and set a target you can defend.
Understanding the cut off starts with understanding which marks it is calculated on. Session-I is 40 questions for 120 marks in 45 minutes with no negative marking, and it is evaluated first - Session-II is assessed only for candidates who qualify Session-I. Session-II is 50 questions for 150 marks in 45 minutes with 1 mark deducted per wrong answer, and it is Session-II performance that feeds the MTS merit list. Because the examination runs across many shifts and days, the Commission normalises marks using its published formula, so cut offs are published as normalised scores with decimal places rather than round raw marks. Separate cut offs are released category-wise and State or UT-wise for MTS; for Havaldar posts the lists are drawn up by Cadre Controlling Authority, and candidates are shortlisted for the PET/PST stage in a fixed ratio to the vacancies. This page states no cut-off figure: those change every cycle and are published only in the result notice at ssc.gov.in.
After an AI mock analysis, we estimate your All-India rank against real cut-off data from 2020-24 rather than against an invented benchmark. It is an estimate and we say so plainly - a projection from past cycles, not a prediction of this one. But a projection anchored to numbers the Commission actually published is a very different thing from a percentage a coaching advertisement pulled out of the air.
Your raw mark is not the number the Commission ranks you on. With the paper spread across many shifts, marks are normalised so that candidates who sat a harder shift are not penalised for it, which is why published cut offs carry long decimal tails. The practical consequence for your preparation is that you cannot target a precise raw score with any confidence - you should target a comfortable margin above the historical band instead of aiming to scrape it.
If you are finishing mocks close to the historical range but not above it, the fix is almost never 'study harder'. Our post-mock report sorts every mistake into conceptual, calculation, careless and time-pressure, and because MTS merit rests on Session-II, it shows you separately how many marks you are losing to negative marking on guesses in General Awareness and English. For most borderline candidates, that single number is larger than the gap they are trying to close.
Roughly 29,000 of our approximately 31,000 questions are authentic previous-year SSC questions with the Commission's official answer keys, MTS papers included. Sitting a real past paper under the correct 45-minute session timing tells you far more about your standing than any predicted cut off can, because it puts your score on the same scale as the results that were actually published.
Because it does not exist until the result is processed. A cut off is an outcome, not a rule: it falls out of how many vacancies there are, how many candidates appeared, how difficult the shifts turned out to be, and how the normalisation formula redistributes marks across those shifts. Any figure published before the result notice is a prediction, however confidently it is presented. The dependable approach is to look at the range across several past cycles for your category and state, treat that as a band rather than a line, and aim comfortably above it.
MTS is conducted in multiple shifts across several days, and no two shifts are exactly equal in difficulty. The Commission therefore applies a published normalisation formula that converts raw marks into a comparable scale, so a candidate who sat a harder shift is not disadvantaged. This is why official cut offs appear as figures with several decimal places instead of whole marks. It also means you cannot work backwards from a published cut off to a raw score with precision - your normalised score can sit slightly above or below your raw one depending on your shift.
No, and confusing the two costs candidates a lot of anxiety. Minimum qualifying marks are a floor the Commission sets in advance by category, and recent notices have stated them as 30 per cent for UR, 25 per cent for OBC and EWS, and 20 per cent for other categories, applied to each session. The cut off is the much higher score at which candidates actually get shortlisted, determined after the exam by vacancies and competition. Clearing the qualifying floor keeps you in the process; clearing the cut off gets you selected. Confirm the qualifying percentages in your cycle's notification.
For MTS posts, the Commission releases separate cut offs by category and by State or Union Territory, because vacancies are distributed across states and competition differs sharply between them. This is the usual explanation when two candidates with similar scores get different outcomes - they were competing in different pools. When you look at past result notices, make sure you are reading the row for your own state and category, since a national-looking figure quoted on a news site is often just the highest state's number.
Havaldar posts in CBIC and CBN have an additional physical stage, so the written cut off serves a different purpose: it decides who is called for the Physical Efficiency Test and Physical Standard Test, with candidates shortlisted in a fixed ratio to the number of vacancies rather than one-for-one. Havaldar lists are also drawn up by Cadre Controlling Authority rather than purely by state, so the same normalised score can qualify under one authority and not another. The shortlisting ratio and the physical standards for your category are specified in the official notification and the result notice.
SSCIntel — free AI-powered SSC mock tests